Product Packaging Impact on Marketing

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Lisa Cain

    Transformative Packaging | Sustainability | Design | Innovation | BP&O Author

    48,174 followers

    Tea Rituals, Unboxed. Tea is a global connector. Whether it's a cozy chat over British afternoon tea, a quick chai on the go in India, or a long, thoughtful sip in a Japanese tea ceremony, it's always been known to bring people together. Each culture has its own unique spin on the ritual, and that's where packaging becomes key. It should capture that essence, creating an experience as rich as the brew itself. That's exactly what Backbone Branding did with ''TeaGether.'' They didn't just design a box. They built a tiny tea gathering. The packaging unfolds like a beautifully set tea table, complete with miniature teapots, chairs, and fabrics that reflect tea cultures from around the world. A portal into global tea traditions. And they didn't stop there. Alongside the tea, TeaGether includes sweets traditionally served in tea ceremonies, turning every unboxing into a full cultural experience. What makes this packaging work is that it doesn't just hold tea and sweets. It tells a story. It draws you in. Much like tea invites conversation. The design pulls you closer, connecting the product to the rich social tradition of tea drinking. More than functional, it becomes part of the ritual itself. Thoughtful, detailed, and instantly engaging. Who's getting the kettle on? 📷Backbone Branding

    • +4
  • View profile for Martin Zarian
    Martin Zarian Martin Zarian is an Influencer

    Stop Hiding, Start Branding. Full-Stack Brand Builder for ambitious companies in complex B2B markets | No-BS strategy, brand, marketing, and activation. PS: I love pickle juice.

    50,487 followers

    When everything is the same, Brand is everything. Let’s play with a thought experiment: In a truly perfect market, branding should not exist. No differentiation. No price control. No customer loyalty. Just one identical product sold by many players at a fixed price. Sounds clean. But also completely detached from reality. Almost like a Black Mirror episode… The Theoretical Paradox: Branding has no place in perfect competition - Products are identical - Buyers have full information - No business has pricing power - Under this model, branding is irrational. Useless. Any marketing effort is a waste of money because buyers already know all products are the same and will pick the cheapest. There is no choice to make. So if branding is economically impossible here… why do we see branded water, branded salt, and branded milk? No market is truly perfect. Ever. Real-life buyers: - Aren’t fully informed - Rely on emotional shortcuts - Don’t always optimise, they satisfice (thanks, Herbert Simon) Even in industries close to perfect competition (B2B), branding thrives by: - Reducing perceived risk (trust) - Offering lifestyle alignment (identity) - Providing a memory shortcut (mental availability) Morton Salt didn’t win by being saltier,  it won by being unforgettable. Liquid Death turned water into rebellion, not hydration. Slack didn’t win on features, it won by branding work as fun, fast, and human. Oatly made oat milk weird, loud, and proudly anti-corporate. Who Gives A Crap made toilet paper feel cheeky, ethical, and worth talking about. Let’s get more real: The Role of Branding in Highly Competitive Markets 1 - Differentiation is a Survival Strategy When features are indistinguishable, innovation is hard to defend, storytelling, emotion and memory step in. Branding manufactures difference where none exists. 2 - Customer Loyalty Beats Race-to-the-Bottom Pricing A loyal customer is less sensitive to small price differences. That’s a margin win. 3 - Perception Drives Premium A brand with trust equity can charge more even in commoditised sectors. Just ask Evian. 4 - Brands Reduce Decision Friction We don’t want to evaluate every choice every time. Brands give us shortcuts and today we need them more than ever… Strategic Moves for Leaders: For CEOs: Compete on brand, not price. Find a purpose customers care about and tell that story consistently. For CMOs: Treat branding as demand creation. Lead gen without memory-building is wasted budget. For CFOs: Brand equity isn’t fluff…it’s a long-term value. Track it like any other asset. So: If you sell in a market where everyone claims the same features, why should a customer pick you? Because when products look the same, the brand becomes the choice. Ask yourself: What are you branding: a commodity or a conviction?

  • View profile for Benji Lamb
    Benji Lamb Benji Lamb is an Influencer

    Founder & CEO @ Asia Circles | Incubator & Accelerator

    28,499 followers

    🥔🧧Lay’s – Turning Local Insights into a Campaign that Gained 1.8% Market Share How did Lay’s achieve this growth in just 2 months during Tet 2024? It’s not random that Lay’s holds the No.2 spot in Vietnam’s potato chips market and leads in urban areas (Brands Vietnam, 2023). The secret lies in their sharp understanding of local insights. 🇻🇳 Consumer Insight for Vietnamese New Year (Tet) Tet is about joy, smiles, and blessings for a prosperous year. For Gen Z, this belief lives on digitally - through gaining blessings (trộm vía) comments, lucky memes, and TikTok sounds to manifest success. With Vietnam’s snacking culture booming 📱 80% open to trying snacks via social media (Mondelez Kinh Do) 🔥 65% choose snacks that follow the latest fads (iPOS, 2023) ✨ From local insight to Innovative Campaign 😁🧧“Smile for Blessings with Lay’s this Tet” (CÓ LAY’S TẾT NÀY – CƯỜI VUI LẤY VÍA). Spreading smiles with Gen Z at the heart, tap into the cultural tradition of gaining blessings (xin vía) 📦Packaging as Blessings: Beautiful smile-themed packs made buying Lay’s feel like bringing home good vibes and luck. -> Throughout all 3 stages, social outreach played a pivotal role in spreading Lay's blessed smiles. The content for our social outreach remains authentic to the social behavior of our audiences, custom-tailored. 📣Starting from the killer insight, eye-catching packaging, and a strategic social plan are contributory factors to Lay’s record-breaking results (BSI Awards): 📈Record-breaking Tết 2024: 1.8% market share gained (highest ever in Tet); 23M smile packs sold; 570M+ impressions with 9.2M engagements across platforms 🌍 What Global Brands Can Learn Anchor in timeless traditions, adapt for modern culture. Lay’s bridged Tet blessings with Gen Z’s digital rituals. Turn local beliefs into brand equity. A simple smile became both packaging innovation and cultural currency. Built with Consumer Behavior at the Core. Lay’s met people where joy was naturally happening, via memes, viral sounds, and everyday expressions 👉For global brands eyeing growth in emerging markets: the lesson is clear. Deep cultural resonance and executed with social-first creativity 🔗Sources: LaysVietnam, BSI Awards, Brands Vietnam, Mondelēz, IPOSvn, Vietnam Briefing, Tomorrowmarketers, 6WResearch *While information from Asia Circles is publicly accessible and derived from third-party sources, its verification and validity are not guaranteed.

  • View profile for Sebastian Baier

    Co-Founder & MD Buynomics | AI that predicts what your customers will buy - before you change a single thing

    9,389 followers

    You optimize price. You should be optimizing product. Pack size. Bottle format. Data volume. Engine power. Every product attribute shapes how customers decide. Yet the methodology behind most RGM work — price elasticity — is structurally blind to all of it. Even though smart product decisions open up far more room for pricing than price changes alone ever could. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗲 𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆? Price elasticity measures how demand changes when you change the price. Volume elasticity measures how demand changes when you change the product itself: pack size, portion, quantity. Shrinkflation. Pack migration. Tiered sizing across channels. These are volume decisions. And they require a different sensitivity measure than the one you're using. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗲𝗿-𝗱𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹. Customers consider pack size, price, ingredients, and more — all at the same time. And these dimensions are not independent: a 10% price increase might lead to a 15% volume loss at the 700g pack but only an 8% loss at 800g. Same price change. Different product context. Different outcome. And your model has no way to separate the two. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝟮𝗗, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝟭𝗗. "The heatmap below maps price change against pack size change." Price change on one axis. Pack size change on the other. Color by demand impact. The dashed line marks equal demand. "Shrinkflation: red. Pack upgrade: green. Same price per unit — opposite demand impact." The iso-demand curve is not symmetric and the pattern shifts by product, format, and competitive context. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻. We've seen how far off the price-only view can be — up to 73% error in complex scenarios. But the deeper issue is scope. Price is one lever. Volume is another. And the same is true for every product attribute: organic vs. conventional, sugar-free vs. regular, premium vs. standard. Each has its own demand sensitivity. Each interacts with the others. And each shifts the competitive landscape in ways price elasticity cannot represent. A shrinkflation move on your flagship doesn't just lose units — it redistributes them. To your mid-size format. To competitors. Out of the category. Where they go depends on which alternative just became more attractive. Price elasticity tells you nothing about this. 𝗔𝗹𝗹 𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀. 𝗜𝗻 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗹. Commercial decisions don't move one variable at a time. A relaunch changes price, size, and positioning simultaneously. A portfolio review restructures assortment, price architecture, and format tiers together. Understanding customer movement — to your product or away from it — requires understanding all these sensitivities at once. Not sequentially in separate spreadsheets. In parallel. What's the most important non-price decision you've had to make — and how did you model it? #pricing #RGM #priceelasticity #commercialstrategy #CPG

  • View profile for Juan Campdera
    Juan Campdera Juan Campdera is an Influencer

    Creativity & Design for Beauty Brands | CEO at We Are Aktivists

    83,118 followers

    The signature at the top In beauty packaging, not every product needs an unconventional bottle to stand out. Sometimes, the smallest element becomes the most distinctive one. More and more brands are turning the cap into the hero of the pack. Oversized proportions, sculptural silhouettes, playful geometries and unexpected shapes are transforming what was once a purely functional component into the product's strongest visual asset. It is a simple design decision with a powerful effect. A distinctive cap immediately catches the eye. It breaks the silhouette consumers are used to seeing, creates curiosity and gives the product an identity that is easy to recognise from a distance. In many cases, people remember the shape of the cap before they remember the label. This approach is especially effective in beauty, where shelves are increasingly crowded with similar formats. A unique closure creates instant differentiation without redesigning the entire package. Beyond aesthetics, it also reinforces memorability. A product with a recognizable cap is easier to spot, easier to recall and more likely to become associated with the brand over time. Sometimes, creating a memorable package does not require making everything different. It simply requires making one detail impossible to ignore. Featured Brands: RawRaw Gisou Wildhood Mousse beauty Daise beauty Nuse Re:nk #PackagingDesign #ProductDesign #BrandIdentity #BeautyTrends #PackagingInnovation  

    • +2
  • View profile for Phil Mc Mahon

    Retail & Engagement Strategist @ Really Good Culture

    7,669 followers

    🐦🔥 This product label has had multiple points of change, but which one is most important? 🟣 Colour shift (orange → purple) → Breaks category sameness at shelf given tinned beans are primarily associated with orange. 🫘 Added nutrition callouts → Gives shoppers instant reasons to choose (protein, fibre, 5-a-day). 🥫 Stronger front-of-pack hierarchy → Faster understanding at shelf and online. 💡Less “what it is”, more “why it matters” → Reflects how people now shop pulses. 📈 I think KTC is responding to plant-based and nutrition-led retail signals, and the nutrition signalling is doing the heaviest lifting – because relevance beats a refresh for the sake of it. ♟️ These small design changes are the face of a big strategic intention. #Retail #PackagingDesign #FMCG #RetailStrategy #ShopperBehaviour #BrandSemiotics

  • View profile for Syed Muhammad Bilal

    Accountant @ Flyjinnah | IBA ’25 | LCL | Ex-Nestlé, TDF |

    4,419 followers

    Why FMCGs Should Focus on Bigger Pack Sizes — Especially in General Trade During my time at Nestlé, I got a close look at how GT (General Trade) operates on the ground—and one thing became very clear: Smaller SKUs move fast, but they’re not always the most efficient, for the business or the consumer. Take something as simple as a soap bar. Small-size soaps are easy to sell, but they offer lower margins, create more packaging waste, and need frequent restocking. Shifting consumers towards medium and large-size products can bring real benefits: * More value for consumers – lower cost per use * Less waste – better for the environment * More convenience – fewer store visits * Higher profits – better returns per unit So how do we drive this shift especially in GT channels? 1. Educate Retailers: GT shopkeepers are influencers. Show them how bigger packs help them earn more. 2. Upselling Incentives: Give rewards or bonuses on medium/large SKU sales. 3. In-Store Visibility: Use posters, shelf talkers, and standout placement to highlight the value of bigger sizes. 4. Bundle Deals: Offer combos like “Buy 2 small, get 1 medium at a discount” to guide behavior. 5. Empower the Field Force: Distributors and sales reps should carry a strong, consistent message. 6. Use Digital Tools for GT: WhatsApp videos or voice notes in local languages can educate retailers quickly and easily. If FMCG leaders like Unilever , Reckitt,Colgate-Palmolive and Nestlé double down on this approach, we’ll see better consumer habits, stronger brand loyalty, and more sustainable business growth. It’s not just about selling more. It’s about selling smarter, with purpose, value, and efficiency. #FMCG #GeneralTrade #RetailStrategy #ConsumerGoods #SalesExecution #SustainableGrowth #Nestle #BrandManagement #Reckitt #Unilever

  • View profile for William Caruso

    Senior Marketing Scientist at Ehrenberg-Bass Institute

    13,439 followers

    A pack is never just a pack. It’s your frontline in the battle for attention on the shelf. Months of work go into getting pack design right: structure, orientation, visual identity. Add to that the careful negotiations around shelf placement and ranging, and you’ve got a product ready to stand out. Until it doesn’t. Because once it hits the shelf, it’s out of your hands. A slight change in orientation, a careless stack, and suddenly the front of pack, the key to recognition, is hidden. The visual identity you worked so hard to tell, lost. This example from PepsiCo shows just how important front of pack branding is. Smart move placing their name on the top of the box, maximising visibility even when the pack is laid flat or carried. Probably not designed to be shelved this way, but I think the thought was there and it still holds up. It’s better than no brand name. Lesson: physical availability isn’t just about being on the shelf. It’s about being seen on the shelf.

  • View profile for Emin DOUKALI

    Marketing & Commercial Leader | Both Sides of the Shelf: GTM, RTM, Trade & Brand Building | Africa · Asia · Europe | FMCG Insight-to-Impact

    2,816 followers

    In Nigeria, the best-selling format for many FMCG categories is a single sachet, 4 to 5 grams, one portion or one cup, one occasion. Torn open on the spot, poured straight in, or washed down with a sachet of water from the same stall. Keep going to Turkey, and you’d be buying a 9kg pack of a comparable product. ⭐️ I assumed the sachet was about purchasing power, people buying small because they couldn’t afford big. I was wrong. 💰 It’s a cash-flow format, not a poverty format. Part of it is pay frequency. In Nigeria, well over half the workforce is informal, and wages can legally be paid daily or weekly rather than monthly. Money trickles in, rather than arriving in one lump. In Turkey, monthly pay is the norm, which is part of why a 9kg pack makes sense there, and would be not relevant for a lot of Nigerian households. 🏠 It’s not unique to one product, either. Coffee, juice, toothpaste, even cereal sold in single-serve sachets rather than the family-size box you’d expect on a European shelf. Wherever cash arrives in small, frequent amounts, packaging follows. The torn sachet on the ground outside a stall isn’t litter. It’s a data point: bought, used, and discarded inside a minute, spent the day the money came in, not saved for next week. Design your pack architecture, route-to-market and margins around the format that makes sense in your home market, and you’ll misread this consumer from day one. The occasion isn’t universal either, the same product can be a morning ritual, a social mixer, or an on-the-spot fix, depending entirely on where you are. Africa’s FMCG sector is currently carried by roughly 1.2 billion consumers, expected to reach 1.7 billion by 2030, with the consumer market projected past $2 trillion in the same period. Miss the logic behind a torn wrapper on the ground, and you’re building for the market you grew up in not the one you’re actually selling to. Markets visits always makes you learn something new, pics from Oke Arin market in Lagos. 🇳🇬 🌎 #FMCG #AfricaBusiness #TradeMarketing #Marketing #EmergingMarkets #ConsumerInsights #RTM #MarketDevelopment

Explore categories