Leadership and Accountability Practices

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Roberta Boscolo
    Roberta Boscolo Roberta Boscolo is an Influencer

    Climate & Energy Leader at WMO | Earthshot Prize Advisor | Board Member | Climate Risks & Energy Transition Expert

    181,445 followers

    🌍 Ten Years After Paris: is the Climate Crisis a Disinformation Crisis? In 2015, the world made a historic promise: to keep global warming well below 2°C, and ideally below 1.5°C. We committed to major emission cuts by 2030, and net-zero by 2050. The Paris Agreement marked a new era of global climate cooperation. But ten years on, we're still struggling with cooperation while the World Meteorological Organization tells us that the Earth’s average temperature exceeded 1.5°C over a 12-month period (Feb 2023–Jan 2024) for the first time. Why? 🔍 A groundbreaking new study, led by 14 researchers for the International Panel on the Information Environment, reviewed 300 studies from 2015–2025. The findings are alarming: powerful interests – fossil fuel companies, populist parties, even some governments – are systematically spreading misleading narratives to delay climate action. 🧠 Misinformation isn't just about denying climate change. It’s now about strategic skepticism – minimizing the threat, casting doubt on science-based solutions, and greenwashing unsustainable practices. 📺 This disinformation flows through social media, news outlets, corporate reports, and even policy briefings. It targets all of us – but especially policymakers, where it can shape laws and delay critical decisions. 💡 So what can we do? 1️⃣ Legislate for transparency and integrity in climate communication. 2️⃣ Hold greenwashers accountable through legal action. 3️⃣ Build global coalitions of civil society, science, and public institutions. 4️⃣ Invest in climate and media literacy for both citizens and leaders. 5️⃣ Amplify voices from underrepresented regions – like Africa – where more research is urgently needed. We must protect not only the planet’s climate, but the integrity of climate information. 🔗 Read more on how disinformation is undermining climate progress – and what we can do about it: https://lnkd.in/eDN9hKAJ 🕰️ The window is small. But with truth, science, and collective action, we can still turn the tide.

  • View profile for David Carlin
    David Carlin David Carlin is an Influencer

    Founder of D.A. Carlin & Company | Former Head of Risk at UNEP FI | Keynote Speaker | Empowering Sustainability Execs in the Green and Digital Transition

    187,602 followers

    What happens when companies break their climate promises? Almost nothing. A new study has uncovered troubling truths about corporate climate commitments. Out of 1,041 companies with emissions reduction targets set for 2020: -9% (88 firms) openly failed to meet their goals. -31% (320 firms) stopped reporting on their targets without explanation. What happens when companies miss these targets? Practically no consequences: -Only three failed companies faced media scrutiny. -No significant market backlash, media sentiment shifts, or ESG rating downgrades. In contrast, companies were rewarded with positive press and improved ESG ratings simply for announcing these targets. The bigger issue: This accountability gap threatens the credibility of ambitious 2030 and 2050 climate pledges. Unlike financial targets, which are rigorously monitored, emissions goals often exist in a vacuum—without oversight or real consequences for failure. Interestingly, the study found that: -Firms in common-law countries and those with stronger media accountability had better success rates. -High-emitting sectors like energy and materials struggled the most, with the highest rates of "disappeared" targets. With more companies backing away from climate action, we cannot afford to let this cycle continue. It’s time for corporate sustainability leadership to move beyond announcements and deliver measurable, transparent results. Accountability mechanisms—demanded by both regulators and stakeholders are urgently needed. A great piece of work by Xiaoyan Jiang, Shawn Kim, and Shirley Simiao Lu! Let’s learn from these insights to ensure that corporate climate pledges actually deliver. #climatechange #netzero #esg

  • View profile for Hans Stegeman
    Hans Stegeman Hans Stegeman is an Influencer

    Chief Economist, Triodos Bank | Columnist | PhD Transforming Economics for Sustainability

    77,439 followers

    🌍  𝗪𝗵𝗼’𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗹𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗶𝘀? New research provides compelling evidence pointing to the wealthiest individuals and major fossil fuel companies. 📌 A recent study ( 🔗 https://lnkd.in/eDBzydZs) covering the period 1990–2020 reveals that the top 10% of global earners are responsible for nearly half of global emissions, while the top 1% contribute 𝟮𝟬 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀 more to global warming than the average person. Their luxury consumption and investment emissions have significantly increased the frequency of extreme heat events, disproportionately affecting vulnerable regions. 🔥 📌 Another groundbreaking study ( 🔗 https://lnkd.in/e3mZGhGX) attributes trillions of dollars in economic losses due to extreme heat between 1991 and 2020 to emissions from major fossil fuel companies like Chevron, ExxonMobil, and BP. These companies' activities have impacted global economies, especially in regions least responsible for emissions. 💸 The intersection is clear: wealthy individuals often hold significant shares in these fossil fuel companies, profiting from activities that drive climate change. Whether we examine emissions through consumption or production, the evidence converges on a single point: 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧. It is not so difficult to come up with an action list: ❇️ Implement progressive taxation on high emitters. ❇️Enforce stringent regulations on fossil fuel companies. ❇️Redirect resources to support those most affected by climate impacts. I know, in a time when the world’s largest emitter drifts further into autocracy, slashing science, sustainability regulation, and everything that might help reduce emissions, this may feel like wishful thinking. But still, we must keep calling out those who are most responsible. 𝗛𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲. 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗮𝘁. 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁. 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁. 🌱

  • View profile for Dave Kline

    Become the Leader You’d Follow | Founder @ MGMT | Coach | Advisor | Speaker | Trusted by 250K+ leaders.

    179,245 followers

    Managers tell me they don't have time to lead. But leaders pull it off in one hour a day. It's not that we don't have time to lead.  It's that we don't have time because we're not leading. - All hands on deck - Fire drills - Heroics They're admirable, but not sustainable. Commit one hour each day.  And become the leader you'd follow. Here's how: 📅 Sunday - Consider • Review last week's wins and misses • Identify your team's biggest bottleneck • Plan one hard conversation you commit to lead 📅 Monday - Commit • Block focus time on your calendar • Set clear weekly priorities with your team • Communicate what success looks like by Friday 📅 Tuesday - Create • Share an article or insight with someone • Find one growth opportunity for a team member • Experiment with a novel approach to an old problem 📅 Wednesday - Connect • Have coffee with someone outside your department • Send three "thinking of you" messages • Ask your team what they need 📅 Thursday - Cut • Cancel one unnecessary meeting • Remove a process that slows your team down • Say no to something that doesn't align with priorities 📅 Friday - Confirm • Check in on weekly commitments • Celebrate somebody's win publicly • Document what you learned this week 📅 Saturday - Chill • Close the laptop completely • Do something that energizes you personally • Call your mom; be present with family and friends The math is simple:  7 days x 1 hour = high ROI leadership The execution is hard:  It takes discipline, consistency, and focus. But that's what leaders do: Hard things. Stop saying you don't have time.  Start making time for what matters. What's your non-negotiable leadership practice?  Drop it in the comments below. If you found this post helpful... 🔔Please follow Dave Kline for more leadership insights. ♻️And repost to help other leaders make time for what matters.

  • View profile for Paul Byrne

    Follow me for posts about leadership coaching, teams, and The Leadership Circle Profile (LCP)

    48,134 followers

    Accountability Nearly every organization I work with at the moment is focused on some version of creating a "high-performance" culture. Alongside this goal is a push for greater speed of decision-making, efficiency, and accountability. However, a common mistake many organizations make is treating accountability as a binary attribute—individuals are either seen as accountable or not. In reality, accountability is more nuanced. Understanding accountability as a spectrum is critical for cultivating a high-performance culture. The Accountability Ladder illustrates this concept by mapping out various levels at which individuals engage with their responsibilities, ranging from unaware or indifferent to becoming proactive and inspiring others. Those familiar with the Leadership Circle Profile will note that accountability transforms as leaders pivot from an external to an internal locus of control. This move from a Reactive to Creative mindset is a critical prerequisite. Here is a summary of each step on the ladder: Unaware: At this level, individuals are not aware of the issues or their responsibilities. They lack the knowledge necessary to understand what needs to be done. Blaming Others: Individuals recognize the issue but choose to blame others rather than taking any responsibility. They see the problem as someone else's fault. Excuses: At this step, individuals acknowledge the problem but offer excuses for why they can't address or resolve it. They often cite external factors or limitations. Wait and Hope: Individuals here are aware of the problem and hope it gets resolved by itself or that someone else will take care of it. There is recognition but no action. Acknowledge Reality: This is a turning point on the ladder. Individuals acknowledge the reality of the situation and their role in it but have not yet begun to take corrective action. Own It: Individuals take ownership of the problem and accept their responsibility for dealing with it. They start to commit to resolving the issue. Find Solutions: At this step, individuals not only take ownership but also actively seek solutions. They explore various options to resolve the problem. Take Action: Individuals implement the solutions they have identified. They take concrete steps to resolve the issue. Make It Happen: Individuals not only take action but also follow through to ensure that the solutions are effective. They monitor progress and make adjustments as necessary. Inspire Others: Leaders inspire and encourage others to take accountability, creating a proactive problem-solving culture. As a team exercise, try writing the steps of the accountability ladder on a whiteboard and ask: What level of accountability do we see across the organization? What level do we exhibit as a team (to each other and our stakeholders)? And finally, where would I place myself?

  • View profile for Jeroen Kraaijenbrink
    Jeroen Kraaijenbrink Jeroen Kraaijenbrink is an Influencer
    333,098 followers

    Leadership is not about power or vision.  This model reminds us that leadership is, above all, social. Every decision we make, every meeting we attend, every word we speak, affects how others feel about their place, their safety, and their belonging. David Rock’s SCARF model captures these subtle yet powerful dynamics in five simple words: Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness, and Fairness. They may sound abstract, but they define the emotional context in which people work. When any of these needs are threatened, the brain reacts as if to physical danger. When they are respected and strengthened, people become open, creative, and engaged. As leaders, we can shape that experience every day. → By recognizing someone’s contribution, we affirm their STATUS.  → By communicating clearly and consistently, we build CERTAINTY. → By giving people influence over their work, we nurture AUTONOMY.  → By showing genuine interest and care, we strengthen RELATEDNESS.  → By treating people with integrity and transparency, we reinforce FAIRNESS. These are not "soft" or optional factors. They form the essential foundation of trust, motivation, and collaboration. When we design meetings, feedback, teams, systems, and organizations with SCARF in mind, we do not just improve morale or team spirit. We create the psychological safety that allows performance and purpose to actually happen and thrive. Which of these five factors requires more attention in your organization?

  • View profile for Jacqueline van den Ende
    Jacqueline van den Ende Jacqueline van den Ende is an Influencer
    57,434 followers

    Groundbreaking new research published in Nature now links the probability of extreme heatwaves occurring directly back to the emissions of individual companies 🏭. For example - according to their research - the probability of the Pacific North West heat dome, that cooked Washington and surroundings at 48.9C 🥵 in 2021 for a week and killed up to 650 people, was 10.000 x higher due to emissions traced back to Exxon Mobil. The study analysed 180 carbon majors (incl BP, Shell, Saudi Aramco, ExxonMobil etc) responsible for 54% of man made (anthropic) emissions and 72% of all fossil emissions ever and concluded that 50% of the increase in heatwave intensity since preindustrial times can be attributed to these carbon majors’ emissions 🔥 Climate change made heatwaves about 20 times more likely in 2000–2009 and about 200 times more likely in 2010–2019. 🔥 These heat waves now kill up to 500,000 people per year. This number is expected to grow between 7-50x by 2070. The longer I work in this field - the more I am realising that the key to real dramatic and fast enough climate action - is simply burning less fossil fuels - which means increasing pressure on fossil companies. Carbon Equity, though it plays a crucial role in accelerating the transition towards a clean energy and climate safe future, humbly, won't save humanity. Neither will drinking oat milk and traveling by train. Don't get me wrong - those are all super important to do. But again 54% of anthropic emissions come from 180 companies. The choices these companies make have a direct and now scientifically increasingly clear relationship to natural disasters and ultimately the survival of the human species. To me it is the moral imperative of leaders in the oil and gas industry, the banks that finance them, the shareholders that own them, to demand responsible change, to invest excess profits in accelerating the transition even if at lower profitability margins, to push cartels to act in unison to self regulate, to work with regulators and act in accordance, not denial of climate science. I believe in dialogue over conflict, cooperation over lawsuits. But if dialogue fails, accountability should follow. The science is now clear: the choices of a few hundred companies shape the survival of billions. Hopefully this new research will support the growing mountain of lawsuits against oil companies. #energytransition #nature #climatescience In below charts 213 heatwaves were allocated into categories of how many times the carbon major increased the likelihood of the heatwave compared to 1850–1900

  • View profile for Lins Werner, MBA, MHRM

    HR Director | Executive HR Leader | Strategic HR Business Partner | Multi-Site Manufacturing | Culture Transformation | Employee Relations | Workforce Strategy

    2,320 followers

    If companies held leaders accountable the way they hold employees accountable, most “performance issues” wouldn’t exist. I’m going to be very direct here: Performance problems are rarely employee problems. They’re leadership consistency problems. You can’t demand excellence from teams when expectations change weekly. You can’t build trust when consequences depend on who’s in the room. You can’t create stability when leaders avoid hard conversations until the damage is already done. Here’s what I’ve learned after transforming organizations across multiple industries: You cannot build accountability down until you build accountability across. Accountability is not: • A write-up • A panic conversation • A last-minute “fix it” meeting • A tool to use when results dip Accountability is: • Clear expectations • Consistent follow-through • Leaders modeling the standards they set • Coaching early instead of correcting late • The same rules applying to everyone, not just employees When leadership is aligned and accountable, teams don’t need to be micromanaged. They rise. They stabilize. They perform. But when leaders excuse each other, avoid each other, or operate on different standards? You don’t get culture — you get chaos. If organizations want retention, engagement, and performance? Stop overcorrecting employees and start calibrating leadership. Because cultures don’t fail from the bottom. They fail from misalignment at the top. #ExecutiveLeadership #LeadershipAccountability #PeopleStrategy #CultureTransformation #HRLeadership #OrganizationalExcellence #LeadershipTruths #PerformanceManagement

  • View profile for Eric Partaker

    The CEO Coach | CEO of the Year | McKinsey, Skype | Bestselling Author | CEO Accelerator | Follow for strategy, company-building, and leadership development

    1,235,549 followers

    Your leadership team is underperforming. (And cracking the whip harder won't fix it.) Here's what nobody tells you about accountability: The harder you push, the less they deliver. I've watched CEOs destroy their executive teams this way: 🔥 Public callouts in meetings 🔥 Micromanaging every decision   🔥 Threats disguised as "motivation" 🔥 Fear-based deadline pressure Result: Your best leaders become corporate zombies. They show up. They comply. They stop caring. The expensive truth: Fear creates compliance. Clarity creates commitment. And you need commitment to win. Real story from last month: → CEO constantly berated his team for missing targets → 3 VPs quit in 6 months → Company lost $2M in transition costs alone Different CEO, different approach: → Created radical clarity around expectations → Listened without judgment → Built safety to admit mistakes early → Revenue up 40% in 12 months The difference? One used accountability as a weapon. The other used it as a framework for excellence. The 4 frameworks that create compassionate accountability: 1. RACI Matrix - Ends the "whose job is this?" chaos (Everyone knows their lane AND their value) 2. OKRs - Aligns hearts and minds (Shared goals create shared ownership) 3. EOS Accountability Chart - One person, one seat (Clear ownership without overlapping egos) 4. OGSM - Strategy meets reality (No more "I thought you meant..." conversations) But here's the key: These aren't hammers to hit people with. They're maps to help people win. The paradox of leadership: High standards + High support = High performance High standards + Low support = High turnover Your leadership team doesn't need more pressure. They need more clarity. Because when accountability comes from compassion, not control: → Problems get solved, not hidden → Leaders take ownership, not cover → Teams push forward, not back Stop managing through fear. Start leading through frameworks. Your leadership team is capable of greatness. But only if you create the conditions for it. Save this. Share it with your team. Because the best leaders don't create followers. They create owners. And ownership starts with clarity. P.S. Want a PDF of my Accountability Cheat Sheet? Get it free: https://lnkd.in/dpWsuT4b ♻️ Repost to help a CEO in your network. Follow Eric Partaker for more leadership insights. — 📢 Want to lead like a world-class CEO? Join my FREE TRAINING: "How to Work with Your Board to Accelerate Your Company’s Growth" Thu Jul 10th, 12 noon Eastern / 5pm UK time https://lnkd.in/dCJ-nCxM 📌 The CEO Accelerator starts July 23rd. 20+ Founders & CEOs have already enrolled. Learn more and apply: https://lnkd.in/dgRr89bM

  • View profile for Elfried Samba

    CEO & Co-founder @ Butterfly Effect | Ex-Gymshark Head of Social (Global)

    420,389 followers

    Focus on “Cause” NOT “Effect” The cause and effect theory states that every action (cause) leads to a corresponding outcome (effect). Staying "in cause" means taking responsibility for your actions and attitudes, which directly influences the outcomes in your life. This is crucial for several reasons: Empowerment and Control: Acknowledging your actions affect your outcomes empowers you to take control of your life and make deliberate choices. Accountability: Staying in cause fosters accountability, reducing the tendency to blame external factors for failures and encouraging personal growth. Proactive Attitude: It encourages proactive behavior, making you an active participant in creating the life you desire. Improved Relationships: Taking responsibility for your behavior builds trust and respect, enhancing interpersonal relationships. Problem-Solving: Recognising your role in problems improves your ability to find effective solutions and prevent future issues. How to Stay in Cause Self-Reflection: Regularly reflect on your actions and their outcomes. Journaling can help track and analyze your behaviors. Set Clear Goals: Define clear, achievable goals and outline steps to reach them, keeping you focused on productive actions. Develop a Growth Mindset: Believe in your ability to grow through effort, viewing challenges as opportunities to learn. Take Responsibility: Own your mistakes and learn from them, evaluating what you could have done differently. Maintain a Positive Attitude: Focus on what you can control, cultivating a positive outlook to stay motivated and resilient. Seek Feedback: Actively seek feedback to gain different perspectives on your actions, using constructive criticism to improve. Practice Mindfulness: Engage in mindfulness practices like meditation to increase self-awareness and align your actions with your intentions. Surround Yourself with Supportive People: Build a network of supportive friends and mentors who encourage you to stay in cause, providing motivation and accountability. Staying in cause with your actions and attitude is key to personal and professional success. By taking responsibility for your behaviors and their outcomes, you empower yourself to create a fulfilling and productive life. Through self-reflection, goal-setting, a growth mindset, and supportive practices, you can maintain a cause-oriented approach and continuously improve your ability to shape your destiny

Explore categories